Iโve been a loyal ChatGPT user for three years. We were inseparable. But lately, Iโve realized I was staying for the memories, not the performance.
๐ง๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐ก๐ง ๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐ช๐ข๐๐๐ก.
Google finally stopped playing around and dropped a suite of tools that actually talk to each other. Iโve moved my entire workflow over to the Gemini ecosystemโspecifically using Google AI Studio, Stitch, and the brilliantly (if not weirdly) named Nano Banana.
Hereโs why the “breakup” was inevitable:
1. The Integration is Actually Real.
๐๐ฉ๐ข๐ต๐๐๐ ๐ง๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ญ๐ด ๐ญ๐ช๐ฌ๐ฆ ๐ข ๐ฃ๐ณ๐ช๐ญ๐ญ๐ช๐ข๐ฏ๐ต ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ช๐ต ๐ช๐ฏ ๐ข ๐ค๐ข๐ฃ๐ช๐ฏ.
You have to go visit it, get your answer, and carry it back to your world. With the Google setup, the bridges are already built.
2. As a UX person, Stitch is a game-changer. Being able to take a rough sketch or a prompt and have Stitch spit out a responsive UI that I can immediately refine in Figma and later in AI Studio as a prototype (yes, I know Make can do this but AI Studio is better, in my experience so far) has cut my dev time in half. Itโs not just “chatting” anymore; itโs building. It waves goodbye to hermits.
3. Nano Banana be-bo-vanana… The image consistency here is wild. I used it to create the image for this post, and the level of control you getโespecially with the Pro versionโmakes DALL-E feel a bit like a toy (a toy a hermit would play with). And it took about 3 min.
The future isnโt just a smarter chatbot; itโs a connected pipeline. Iโm not looking back.
Well, what do you think? Have you used both or one or the other? Where do you think this is going to take us?
AI and Empathy: Reimagining Health Tech Through the Human Experience
Beyond Data: How AI and UX Can Restore the Human Side of Healthcare After nearly losing my life to a heart attack, I began seeing healthcare through an entirely new lens. Not as a UX designer or AI business leader, but as a patient โ vulnerable, uncertain, and deeply...




0 Comments